ArgumenTroupe is a multi-agent AI debate platform you can use for early product research. Two to five AI personas with distinct viewpoints argue a yes/no question about your product concept, feature or pricing in a venue you choose; an AI judge gives a verdict and a simulated audience picks its own winner. The result is simulated perspectives, not real user research — useful for finding objections and hypotheses before you test with real people.
Let diverse AI personas debate your product ideas, features, and pricing. Get the objections, edge cases, and positioning insights before committing resources.
Best for: Product managers, UX designers, startup founders validating MVP, research teams, and innovation departments.
Real user research takes weeks to recruit participants and schedule sessions. By the time you get feedback, your window may have passed.
Small sample sizes limit insight diversity. You get 6-8 people who may all think similarly or be influenced by one dominant voice.
Iterating on feedback is expensive. Each traditional research round costs time and budget, so early ideas rarely get tested more than once.
Multi-perspective AI debates that surface objections in minutes.
Nine persona archetypes with 35 tunable traits — from the challenging Devil's Advocate to the visionary Futurist.
Debate product concepts, features, and pricing questions in minutes instead of weeks. Hear the arguments before investing in development.
Run one debate per variation of your concept, message or price, and compare the verdicts and audience reactions.
A simulated audience of 3, 5, 7 or 10 reacts to the debate and picks its own winner, next to the AI judge's verdict.
Arguments against your idea surface before you spend on real research.
Get several perspectives in minutes instead of waiting weeks for recruitment and scheduling.
The debate's arguments as a tree you can review and save to Argumentree.
ArgumenTroupe is one of four products that cover decision-making from human deliberation to AI governance.
Collaborative decision-making platform. Teams map decisions as structured pro/con argument trees and rate them.
Corporate strategy →Collective AI reasoning platform. Several AI models build and rate one argument tree — consensus and controversy become visible.
Multi-LLM analysis →Decision tracing and EU AI Act evidence for AI agents. Capture why AI agents decide.
AI governance →Multi-agent AI debate platform. Two to five AI personas argue a yes/no question, judged by an AI and a simulated audience.
Learn more →Each persona argues from a consistent archetype and its tuned traits. The answers are simulated perspectives — not a replacement for real user research — but they are good at surfacing obvious issues and hypotheses to test.
You choose which archetypes debate, tune their traits, and frame the topic and venue for your product domain. Fully custom personas are not available yet.
Get several diverse perspectives on your product in minutes. Free trial available.
Coming Soon